themiloc
Επαγγελματίας
- Μηνύματα
- 1.069
- Reaction score
- 257
Most visitors online was 4039 , on 10 Oct 2025
-
Καλώς ήρθατε στο AVsite! Ελάτε στην παρέα μας κάνοντας εγγραφή!
Benchmark Media Application Notes
- Thread starter themiloc
- Ημερομηνία δημιουργίας
- Μηνύματα
- 181
- Reaction score
- 252
Ενδιαφέρον άρθρο.
Y
Yiannis_B
Guest
Έχει αρκετή πληροφορία στα application notes! Thanks! 
Τα CD players έχουν χειρότερο ήχο από EAC extraction...χαχαχα! - Βρείτε το μόνοι σας γιατί, δεν βάζω λινκ.
...και doubling the sample rate improves the noise performance by 3 dB. Quadrupling the sample rate improves the noise performance by 6 dB. From a noise standpoint, quadrupling the sample rate is equivalent to adding 1 bit. Please note that a quadrupling of the sample rate also quadruples the file size of a digital recording. Adding 1 bit to a 24-bit system would only increase the file size by 4%. For this reason, sample rates should not be increased in an effort to improve noise performance. Sample rates should only be increased enough to accurately transmit all of the frequencies that are detectable by our auditory systems.
https://benchmarkmedia.com/blogs/ap...t-audio-has-more-resolution-than-16-bit-audio
Και..."Jumping to an 88.2 kHz or 96 kHz (2X) sample rate should eliminate all concerns about exceeding the limits of our hearing. These systems provide a 44 kHz to 48 kHz upper limit on the frequency response. They also capture everything that we can capture with today's microphones. Furthermore, few loudspeaker transducers can reach these frequencies. With today's transducer technology, 2X sample rates are more than adequate. There is absolutely no advantage to sampling at 4X (176.4 kHz and 192 kHz) rates.
Transducers will improve, but human ears will stay the same. With improved transducers, the difference between 192 kHz and 96 kHz may be audible, but only because it makes the dogs bark. Anyone who claims otherwise may be barking up the wrong tree.
https://benchmarkmedia.com/blogs/application_notes/14949325-high-resolution-audio-sample-rate
Σωστός ο John Siau. ! - Τα χώνει και στο DSD
Τα CD players έχουν χειρότερο ήχο από EAC extraction...χαχαχα! - Βρείτε το μόνοι σας γιατί, δεν βάζω λινκ.
...και doubling the sample rate improves the noise performance by 3 dB. Quadrupling the sample rate improves the noise performance by 6 dB. From a noise standpoint, quadrupling the sample rate is equivalent to adding 1 bit. Please note that a quadrupling of the sample rate also quadruples the file size of a digital recording. Adding 1 bit to a 24-bit system would only increase the file size by 4%. For this reason, sample rates should not be increased in an effort to improve noise performance. Sample rates should only be increased enough to accurately transmit all of the frequencies that are detectable by our auditory systems.
https://benchmarkmedia.com/blogs/ap...t-audio-has-more-resolution-than-16-bit-audio
Και..."Jumping to an 88.2 kHz or 96 kHz (2X) sample rate should eliminate all concerns about exceeding the limits of our hearing. These systems provide a 44 kHz to 48 kHz upper limit on the frequency response. They also capture everything that we can capture with today's microphones. Furthermore, few loudspeaker transducers can reach these frequencies. With today's transducer technology, 2X sample rates are more than adequate. There is absolutely no advantage to sampling at 4X (176.4 kHz and 192 kHz) rates.
Transducers will improve, but human ears will stay the same. With improved transducers, the difference between 192 kHz and 96 kHz may be audible, but only because it makes the dogs bark.
Anyone who claims otherwise may be barking up the wrong tree.https://benchmarkmedia.com/blogs/application_notes/14949325-high-resolution-audio-sample-rate
Σωστός ο John Siau. ! - Τα χώνει και στο DSD